Friday, August 17, 2007
Reading List
(10 copies at Beaufort Branch Library in both the Local History and Book Club areas)
October 18-The Year of Magical Thinking by Joan Didion-Discussion leader: Judy (3 copies in the library system; 1 copy at Beaufort Branch)
November 15-The Devil in the White City by Erik Larson-Discussion leader: Fran
(11 copies in the library system; 3 copies at Beaufort Branch)
December 13 (2nd Thursday of the month to avoid the holidays)
The Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad-discussion leader: Alice
(4 books in the system; 1 at Beaufort Branch and separate books on CD at both Beaufort and Bluffton.)
January 17-Saints at the River by Ron Rash-Discussion leader: Brenda
(4 books in the library system; 1 at Beaufort)
Wednesday, August 01, 2007
August Meeting
PS
I apologize. An earlier post had the wrong date. We are meeting today!! If you can't come, send me a list of your book choices by email: fhays@bcgov.net. Our "Comments" link to the blog is disabled at the moment for unknown reasons. When it is back up, feel free to use it to communicate, and I will make a post from your comments.
Thursday, July 19, 2007
Digging to America
Let's start with the title. Is this a play on the familiar phrase "digging to China?" I believe that's a metaphor for working at something for so long and hard it was as if you were "digging to China." So is "Digging to America" similar inthat against great odds these Asian babies have come to be rescued and live in America? Is the author using the word "America" as metaphor for a utopian existence--a Mecca or Shangri-La? Some place or some state (like Nirvana) that we all aspire to?
Taylor doesn't fill the book with much plot; it's more about attitudes and traditions and impressions and character-building.
Regarding the naming of the Korean girls, I think the Yazdans, both first generation Americans of Iranian parents, are still very conscious of their ethnicity and ever mindful of "fitting in" to Western society. Therefore, they have opted to eschew her given name Sooki for Susan, a somewhat similar American one. The Dickinson-Donaldsons, several generations American, embrace Jin-Ho's Koren name and even dress her up in traditional clothing on occasion and teach her Korean songs. They are not as threatened about blending in and about their Americanness, because they were already deeply established in the culture.
Maryam's character is developed more fully than all the others combined. In my view, the book leans most towards being first person Maryam; perhaps her character is one the author is very familiar and comfortable with. Maryam is a complex woman. The classic introvert. I readily identify with her! Like Maryam, I think it would be unforgivable if someone put me on the spot in front of so many people and popped "the question." (aside: Is overconfidence an extrovert trait?) What I don't understand, is how she could be such a freethinking feminist in her native country, but put all that aside in this county. Is it because she was trying to help her husband (and herself) fit in to America's status quo, her mainstream way of being? What changed for her? But here she is, later in the book, long after the death of her husband, where she has every opportunity, every right to be an eccentric feminist and she plays it safe instead. For Maryam, the less you say, the less chance you have of making a mistake and looking even more like an outsider. "Very rarely did she go out in public in the mornings. Going out was work. It required conversation. It raised the possibility of mistakes."
and
"Somehow, for no other reason she could name, she had never felt at home in her own country or anywhere else; which was probably why her three best friends were foreigners."
Maryam's relationship with Dave could be a cautionary tale for those too proud to let down their guard and dare to be loved or needed. "She had resented his never-ending neediness. It hadn't yet occurred to her that a life where no one needed her would be a weak, dim, pathetic life." But then she calls herself a fool for falling in love. It's a constant struggle with Maryam, her desire to be above all that--all that is needy and emotional, versus BELONGING and all the give-and-take-and-feelings that come with that. "Oh, the agonizing back and forth of romance! The advances and retreats, the secret wounds, the strategic withdrawals."
Maryam sets wide boundaries. She suffers in silence (and enjoys it!). Some people don't want to be rescued. Maryam finds comfort and balance in her sterile, staid, minimalist home environment.
At time, Anne Tyler's writing has a poetic aesthetic. I love her alliterative passages such as "...he was just another hapless man desperate for a helpmate." And "She greeted Farah with a flood of Farsi."
But at other times, Tyler's writing is inconsistent and confusing, particularly in the end. All of a sudden in Chapter 9 we go from equal coverage of the Yazdans and Dickinson-Donaldsons to first-person Jin-Ho. Bitsy and Brad throughout this entire chapter are Jin-Ho's mom and Jin-Ho's dad this, and Jin-Ho's grandpa that. I found it very distracting and disruptive of the flow of the book. Also, I had to reread the ending to see if I missed something. It was as if she'd forgotten what she'd written already. "She and Dave were spending every day together and every night." (aside: Were they conjugal or merely companions?) Then, 20 pages later, Farah is visiting Maryam and asks, "Do you ever hear from him?" "Oh, from Dave," Maryam said. "No."
That said, I think it was an overall good book that proposes many important questions of what it means to belong; both to a country, and to a relationship or family. Why do some fear eccentricity and "otherness" while others embrace it?
Is there anywhere that books are rated like films? If not, why? I give this a 2-3/4 star rating out of 4.
~ Brenda
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
July Meeting
Please bring a list of books that we can consider for fall and winter.
Tuesday, July 03, 2007
Questions for Discussion: "Digging to America"
Sandi Jordan has agreed to lead our July 19 discussion of Digging to America by Anne Tyler. See you on the second floor at 5:30!
Below are discussion questions provided by Random House:
1. In calling their baby Susan, the Yazdans “chose a name that resembled the name she had come with, Sooki, and also it was a comfortable sound for Iranians to pronounce” [p. 10]. The Donaldsons keep their baby’s Korean name, Jin-Ho. What is the significance of these choices, both within the context of the novel and in the context of adoption in general? Is it important for an adoptive family to give children from another country or ethnic group a sense of their heritage? What insights does Ziba and Bitsy’s fractious disagreement about “Americanization” [p. 46] offer into this question?
2. Right from the start, Maryam feels a deep connection with Susan—“something around the eyes, some way of looking at things, some onlooker’s look: that was what they shared. Neither one of them quite belonged” [p. 13]. Does Maryam’s pleasure in bonding with Susan hint at needs or emotions that she is unable or unwilling to acknowledge? To what extent does her insistence that she is “Still and forever a guest, on her very best behavior” [p. 15] serve as a convenient excuse for remaining aloof from other people?
3. What aspects of her heritage does Maryam value most and why? Why is she so unsettled by her visit to Iran and her reactions to Iranians in the country [p. 39]? Why is she annoyed when her cousin’s American husband sprinkles bits of Farsi into his conversation [p. 147]? Why has she raised Sami to be “more American than the Americans” [p. 83], even as she clings to her otherness?
4. Does Maryam’s behavior show that she feels not only estranged from American society but also in some way superior to it? What specific incidents and conversations bring this aspect of her personality to light?
5. In addition to being a wonderfully amusing vignette, what is the import of Sami’s “performance piece” [pp. 80–81]? Why does Tyler use humor and mockery to convey a serious point about Americans and how they appear to immigrants? Does the fact that Sami is American-born and-raised make his criticisms more credible (and perhaps more acceptable) than they would be if a newcomer to the country expressed them?
6. How does Maryam differ from Ziba’s parents and her cousin Farah, the other Iranian immigrants depicted in the novel? What factors, both practical and psychological, influence the characters’ desire and ability to make a place for themselves in American society? What do these varying portraits show about the process of assimilation? Are there inherent contradictions between accepting the culture of an adopted homeland and retaining one’s ethnic identi
7. Compare and contrast Ziba and Bitsy. How do they differ as women? As mothers? Which woman is more sympathetically drawn? How does Tyler use both negative and positive attributes to bring each woman to life? How do the women’s individual approaches to motherhood influence the way they regard and evaluate each other? Is Ziba overly susceptible to Bitsy’s criticism and suggestions? Does her friendship with Ziba, as well as her frequent encounters with Maryam, affect Bitsy’s beliefs or behavior? Does the relationship between Ziba and Bitsy change over the course of the book?
8. How do the portraits of Sami and Brad compare to those of their wives? Are their personalities as richly described? Do they play parallel roles within their families? Is their behavior in relation to their children and wives a reflection of their personalities and the nature of their marriages, or do cultural patterns, expectations, and values also play a part?
9. Does the romance between Dave and Maryam unfold in a realistic way? In addition to Dave’s moving reaction to Connie death, what other events or conversations show that he contains a depth and a self-awareness that Maryam and the others seem oblivious to?
10. What does Maryam’s description of her courtship and marriage [pp. 155–160] add to our image of her? Why has she chosen to keep the story to herself, not even sharing it with Sami?
11. Discuss Maryam’s reaction to Dave’s proposal [pp. 211–214]. What does her conversation with Sami and Ziba reveal about her difficulties in reconciling her prejudices about Americans and her affection for Dave? In what ways do her protests also bring to light her ambivalent feelings about who she is and what she is willing to give up at this stage of her life? Why do you think Maryam makes the decision she does at the end of the book?
12. To what extent does Digging to America echo the themes and concerns Tyler explored in her previous novels? Do Tyler’s views on marriage and family here differ in significant ways from those presented in her earlier works? How does Digging to America compare to other books you have read that portray women trying to establish an identity apart from what is expected—or demanded—of them?
Monday, July 02, 2007
Questions: July and August Meetings
We did put off reading Devil in the White City by Erik Larson because it is long. What about doing it in September? There are 12 copies in the library system, and there is lots of time. Yes? No? Other choices?
Fran
Review of Heat by Bill Buford prepared by Brenda
Journalist Bill Buford explores the mysteries and kitchen secrets of EVERYTHING that goes into and onto the plate of a restaurant meal. Buford’s book project begins as a chronicle of the life and times of the famed chef, Maurio Batali, of NYC’s three-star restaurant, Babbo. His curiosity of what goes on behind the scenes in a gourmet restaurant soon becomes an obsession as he attempts to emulate his subject as Batali’s cook/kitchen slave. But after learning what goes on in the various stations, the pasta station, the grill, the pastry station, the plate-and-serve station, the produce prep station, etc., and even getting promoted to line cook, this is not enough. Buford then wants to study with the masters that shaped the creative genius of Mario Batali. After several trips to Europe to apprentice with pasta makers, butchers and noted chefs, Buford gives us vivid picture of the entire process of how a gourmet meal becomes gourmet.
He delves into the history and philosophy of cooking, regional variations and practices, the importance of buying fresh and local (when available, as long as it is not inferior) and shaping the weekly menu around that, not selecting a menu then trying to find the food to make it. Even purchasing meat requires an education in what the animal was fed, and where it was raised, or under what conditions a particular crop was harvested. And then there are the strong personalities one finds in the great restaurant kitchens of the world. There was a repeated theme of these larger-than-life chefs, all competitive, high-energy, in-your-face, socially inappropriate, ECCENTRIC, emotionally-charged, temperamental, and yet extremely quick (in body and mind), talented individuals. One chef stated “I prefer working with women. There is so much less testosterone bravura.”
The book is “peppered” with recipes, food terms, wine pairings, and helpful cooking techniques. And there is something for everyone to “chew” on here; a travel guide to fine dining and drinking as well as a travel guide to the great food regions of Italy, France, and England:13 pages written about cookery, travel, and literature.
Yes, Buford and some of his subjects are quite poetic at times:
"Teresa was effervescently happy. She hummed, broke into song, laughed at the slightest absurdity, and because she found the world delightfully absurd, she laughed all the time, unless she laughed too hard, and then she cried. "
"It’s not the breed but the breeding."
"For Dario, implicit in the culture of a place was its language and its art AND its food—maybe the most direct expression because the habits of cooking and eating arise out of the land itself."
And referring to the slow, steady curing and cooking of old, “You cannot do traditional work at a modern pace.”
For someone who is not passionate about fine food and drink, this book would be a difficult read. But as a psychological study in obsessive, exhibitionist personalities and a rare glimpse into some of the great kitchens and how a dinner dish comes together, it is an exciting read. At times Buford repeats himself, and we’re not sure if it’s bad editing or perhaps to underscore a point. And he borrows liberally from other “foodies”; even his title is taken from British chef Marco Pierre White’s book “White Heat.” Interestingly Buford comes full circle in this book from his first dinner with Mario-the-great-chef to the last chapter, another dinner with Mario where he is more the chef’s equal, even being encouraged to open his own restaurant.
Oh, did I mention that during Buford’s entire “one-track fetish with all things cookery,” that he was married? His wife Jessica Green, also a successful journalist, sometimes accompanied him to Europe. She must be a saint, tolerating his taking over their apartment kitchen for a week while he dresses every part of a pig; he would go for days without seeing her, coming home during the wee hours after cooking late then staying up until dawn trying to unwind. Buford (at age 50) and his wife are now parents of twin boys. In a a quote from Dante’s Divine Comedy, he dedicates his book “For Jessica …che move il sole e l’altre stelle” (“whose love moves the sun and the stars”).
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Comment on Eat, Pray, Love
Thursday, June 14, 2007
Comment from a member
Food for thought:Since there are some "summer reads" I've been looking forward to, I won't be able to read those AND book club selections. I will probably not attend the next 2-3 months so that I can focus on some other things. If I'm not the only one wanting to take a break, I propose we do something that would take less personal time but still would be a meaningful book club meeting. We could have 1 month where people select 2-3 poems from their favorite poet(s) to share with the group, as well as a bit about the poet. Another meeting could be the same with essays. There are many wonderful books of essays and poetry out there that are often overlooked. And then there are the short stories, some by prominent authors, others unknown. How do these compare with their larger works?